Opened 7 years ago
Last modified 5 years ago
#566 assigned enhancement
MS Spetrum viewer
| Reported by: | Rene Ranzinger | Owned by: | Rene Ranzinger |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | GRITS - next version |
| Component: | MS data management | Version: | GRITS 1.0.x |
| Severity: | major | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | dbrentw |
Description
The spectrum viewer for MS entry should not have annotated peaks option as checkbox.
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by
| Owner: | set to dbrentw |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by
| Owner: | changed from dbrentw to Rene Ranzinger |
|---|
comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by
| Milestone: | GRITS - 1.1 SR1 → GRITS - 1.1 SR2 |
|---|
comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by
| Milestone: | GRITS - 1.2 → GRITS - 1.2 SR1 |
|---|
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by
| Milestone: | GRITS - 1.2 SR1 → GRITS - 1.2 SR2 |
|---|
comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by
| Milestone: | GRITS - 1.2 SR2 → GRITS - next version |
|---|
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
We discussed this. I consider a peak "annotated" if there is any information assigned to it, be it special peaks or a glycan assignment. In my mind, we can call it annotated w/ a special peak assignment.
We need to decide to leave it as it is (my suggestion) or change the language but keep the functionality.